November 13, 2019
Improved Graphics and Report Printing
Year-End Is One of the Few Times Engineers Can Actually Rethink Tools Most engineers don’t change core analysis software in the middle of a deadline-driven project. End of year is different. Budgets are closing out, project schedules tend to soften slightly, and teams finally have a moment to evaluate what worked — and what slowed them down. That combination creates a rare window to reassess tools without the pressure of an active permit submission. For many firms, it’s also when leadership asks bigger operational questions: Are we spending too much time reworking models? Are our engineers relying too heavily on spreadsheets? Are we confident scaling into slightly larger or more complex jobs next year? Budget Resets and Training Calendars Create Natural Momentum Year-end decisions often align with practical realities. Software budgets reset in January, making it easier to justify a purchase that didn’t fit earlier in the year. Training calendars are also easier to plan before the new project backlog fills up. Engineers can start the year productive instead of learning a new workflow mid-project. This timing matters. Firms that switch tools before the new year often avoid the “we’ll deal with it later” trap — and later rarely comes…
Read More
In this video, you’ll learn how to investigate your RISA-3D model for P-Delta divergence errors. This type of error is common in general structural analysis software and has two major causes: a model that is unstable or a model that is too flexible. For this investigation, two separate steel frame...
Our monthly "Structural Moment" newsletter is the best way to keep up with RISA’s product updates, new releases, new features, training events, webinars and more...